Hugo Shaw Hugo Shaw's Pagina del profilo

Hugo Shaw Hugo Shaw

0 Iscritto al Corso • 0 Corso completato

Biografia

New ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials - Dumps ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Download

If you are confusing while preparing for your test, you can choose to trust our information resource and experienced experts rather than waste a lot of time on learning aimlessly. Our PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam guide materials are edited by professional experts based on latest and exact information about the real test. Generally the passing rate is high up to 99.79%. If you want to pass exam as soon as possible, our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Guide Materials will be most useful product for you.

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam Syllabus Topics:

Topic
Details

Topic 1

Closing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and explains how to complete the audit process. It includes reporting findings, managing nonconformities, and conducting follow-ups to ensure continuous improvement and compliance.

Topic 2

Managing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit program: This section of the exam measures the skills of an AI Compliance Officer and deals with overseeing an entire audit program. It involves managing multiple audits, tracking audit performance, and aligning audit outcomes with broader organizational goals related to AI governance.

Topic 3

Preparing an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and covers how to plan and prepare for an AI management system audit. It includes creating audit plans, selecting team members, and setting clear objectives to ensure a smooth audit process.

Topic 4

Conducting an ISO
IEC 42001 audit: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on executing the audit according to ISO
IEC 42001 guidelines. It includes collecting evidence, interviewing relevant staff, and evaluating compliance with the AI management system standards.

Topic 5

Fundamental audit concepts and principles: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and outlines essential audit concepts such as evidence collection, impartiality, objectivity, and ethical conduct. It introduces the core principles that form the foundation of a reliable and consistent auditing process.

Topic 6

AI management system requirements: This section of the exam measures the skills of a Lead Auditor and focuses on understanding the key requirements outlined in ISO
IEC 42001. It explains how organizations should structure their AI-related activities and processes to meet compliance standards effectively.

>> New ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Study Materials <<

ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam free prep material & ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor valid braindumps

If you want our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor study materials to download and print, the PDF version is perfect for you since it has the function of being printable. And the PDF version of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions can be noted when you want to memory something as well as to indicate the keypoints. Also, our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Preparation exam is unlimited in number of devices, making it easy for you to learn anytime, anywhere.

PECB ISO/IEC 42001:2023Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Sample Questions (Q92-Q97):

NEW QUESTION # 92
Which core element emphasizes that AI systems should be designed to avoid bias and ensure fair treatment for all individuals?

A. Fairness and Non-Discrimination
B. Accountability
C. Human-Centered Design
D. Transparency and Explainability

Answer: A

Explanation:
The principle ofFairness and Non-Discriminationis one of the core ethical and governance pillars emphasized inISO/IEC 42001:2023, especially inClause 4.2 (Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties)andClause 6.1 (Actions to address risks and opportunities)where ethical risks related to AI systems are assessed.
According to the standard and accompanying PECB training guide, fairness is defined as ensuring thatAI systems do not create or perpetuate bias, and that individuals and groups aretreated equitably, with measures in place to detect and mitigate discrimination. This is often embedded in risk assessments and operational controls when managing AI systems.
In ISO/IEC 42001, organizations are required to considerethical, legal, and societal impactsof their AI systems, andFairness and Non-Discriminationis a key tenet oftrustworthy AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023, Clauses 4.2, 6.1.2, and 8.2.3
PECB Lead Auditor Course Guide, Section on "Ethical Principles of AI," Subsection: Fairness and Non- Discrimination

NEW QUESTION # 93
Scenario 2 (continued):
Empsy HR Solutions is a human resources consulting company that provides innovative HR solutions to diverse industries.Recognizing the significant impact of artificial intelligence Al in HR processes, including its ability to automate repetitive tasks, analyzevast amounts of data for insights, improve recruitment and talent management strategies, and personalize employee experiences, thecompany has initiated the implementation of an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001.
Initially, the top management established an Al policy that was aligned with the company's objectives. The Al policy provided a frameworkfor defining Al objectives, a commitment to meeting relevant requirements, and a dedication to continually improve the AIMS. However, it did not refer to other organizational policies, although some were relevant to the AIMS. Afterward, the top management documented thepolicy, communicated it internally, and made it accessible to interested parties.
The top management designated specific individuals to ensure that the AIMS meets the standard's requirements. Additionally, theyensured that these individuals were responsible for overseeing the AIMS, reporting its performance to the top management, andfacilitating continual improvement. Moreover, in its awareness sessions, the company focused exclusively on ensuring that all personnel were informed about the Al policy, emphasizing their role in ensuring the effectiveness of the AIMS and the benefits of enhanced Alperformance.
The company also planned, implemented, and monitored processes to meet AIMS requirements. Additionally, it set clear criteria andimplemented controls based on them, ensuring effective operation, alignment with organizational objectives, and continual improvement.Empsy HR Solutions decided to implement strict measures to control changes to documented information within the AIMS. To ensure theintegrity and accuracy of documentation, the company adopted version control practices. Each document update was tracked using aversioning system, with clear records of what was modified, who made the changes, and when the updates occurred. Access to makechanges was restricted to authorized personnel, and any proposed modifications required approval from the designated managementteam before being implemented.
Moreover, considering past experiences where the company encountered unforeseen risks, Empsy HR Solutions established acomprehensive Al risk assessment process. This process involved identifying, analyzing, and evaluating Al risks to determine if it isnecessary to implement additional controls than those specified in Annex A. The company also referred to Annex B for guidance onimplementing controls and, ultimately, produced a Statement of Applicability SoA. The SoA contained the necessary controls, including allthe controls of Annex A and justifications for their inclusion or exclusion.
Lastly. Empsy HR Solutions decided to establish an internal audit program to ensure the AIMS conforms to both the company'srequirements and ISO/IEC 42001. It defined the audit objectives, criteria, and scope for each audit, selected auditors, and ensuredobjectivity and impartiality during the audit process. The results of the first audit were documented and reported only to the top management of the company.
Question:
Based on Scenario 2, has Empsy HR Solutions established a suitable internal audit program?

A. No, the company should outsource the internal audit function to ensure objectivity and impartiality
B. No, results of audits should also be reported to the relevant managers
C. Yes, the internal audit program was established in accordance with ISO/IEC 42001 requirements
D. Yes, provided results are communicated only to top management

Answer: B

Explanation:
ISO/IEC 42001 Clause 9.2.2 specifies thatinternal audit results should be communicated to relevant managementin addition to top management. Only informing top management is insufficient and nonconforming.
Reference:ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.2 (Internal Audit Program Communication).

NEW QUESTION # 94
Scenario 5 (continued):
Scenario 5: Aizoia, located in Washington, DC, has revolutionized data analytics, software development, and consulting by usingadvanced Al algorithms. Central to its success is an Al platform adept at deciphering complex datasets for enhanced insights. To ensure that its Al systems operate effectively and responsibly, Aizoia has established an artificial intelligence management system AIMS basedon ISO/IEC 42001 and is now undergoing a certification audit to verify the AIMS's effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 42001.
Robert, one of the certification body's full-time employees with extensive experience in auditing, was appointed as the audit team leaderdespite not receiving an official offer for the role. Understanding the critical importance of assembling an audit team with diverse skills and knowledge, the certification body selected competent individuals to form the audit team. The certification body appointed a team ofseven members to conduct the audit after considering the specific conditions of the audit mission and the required competencies.
Initially, the certification body, in cooperation with Aizoia, defined the extent and boundaries of the audit, specifying the sites (whetherphysical or virtual), organizational units, and the activities for review. Once the scope, processes, methods, and team composition hadbeen defined, the certification body provided the audit team leader with extensive information, including the audit objectives anddocumented details on the scope, processes, methods, and team compositions.
Additionally, the certification body shared contact details of the auditee, including locations, time frames, and the duration of the auditactivities to be conducted. The team leader also received information needed for evaluating and addressing identified risks andopportunities for the achievement of the audit objectives.
Before starting the audit, Robert wrote an engagement letter, introducing himself to Aizoia and outlining plans for scheduling initialcontact. The initial contact aimed to confirm thecommunication channels, establish the audit team's authority to conduct the audit, andsummarize the audit's key aspects, such as objectives, scope, criteria, methods, and team composition. Duringthis first meeting, Robertemphasized the need for access to essential information that would help to conduct the audit.
Moreover, audit logistics, such as scheduling, access, health and safety arrangements, observer attendance, and the need for guides orinterpreters, were thoroughly planned. The meeting also addressed areas of interest or concern, preemptively resolving potential issuesand finalizing any matters related to the audit team composition.
As the audit progressed, Robert recognized the complexity of Aizoia's operations, leading him to conclude that a review of its Al-relateddata governance practices was essential for compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. He discussed this need with Aizoia's management,proposing an expanded audit scope. After careful consideration, they agreed to conduct a thorough review of the Al data governancepractices, but there was no mutual decision to officially change the audit scope. Consequently. Robert decided to proceed with the auditbased on the original scope, adhering to the initial audit plan, and documented the conversation and decision accordingly.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 5, did the certification body provide all the necessary information to conduct the audit to the audit team leader?

A. No, the audit team leader did not receive details on the audit team's training requirements
B. Yes, all the necessary information was provided to the audit team leader
C. No, information on the resources necessary to conduct the audit was not provided

Answer: B

Explanation:
The certification body providedall the necessary information, including scope, objectives, methods, contact information, and risks.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2 state that the certification body must equip the audit team leader with sufficient information for audit planning and execution.
* TheLead Auditor Study Materialconfirms:"Audit planning must be supported by complete and verified information provided by the certification body." Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.2.3.1; ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Clause 9.2.

NEW QUESTION # 95
What does the 'Human-Centered Design' core element prioritize in AI development?

A. Maximizing profit
B. Designing AI systems that prioritize human needs and values
C. Minimizing user interaction
D. Increasing automation

Answer: B

Explanation:
Human-Centered Designfocuses on designing AI systems thatrespect and enhance human well-being, align withuser needs and values, and promoteinclusive and accessible technologies.
According toISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clauses 4.2 and 6.1.2, and highlighted throughout thePECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1, AI systems should beusable, inclusive, and ethically aligned, especially when intended for diverse or vulnerable user groups.
This principle ensures thathumans remain in control and benefitfrom the capabilities of AI.
Reference: ISO/IEC 42001:2023 - Clause 4.2 (Needs of interested parties), Clause 6.1.2 (Ethical impact and risk analysis) PECB Lead Auditor Guide - Domain 1: "Human-Centered Design and Trustworthy AI"

NEW QUESTION # 96
Scenario 7 (continued):
Scenario 7: ICure, headquartered in Bratislava, is a medical institution known for its use of the latest technologies in medical practices. Ithas introduced groundbreaking Al-driven diagnostics and treatment planning tools that have fundamentally transformed patient care.
ICure has integrated a robust artificial intelligence management system AIMS to manage its Al systems effectively. This holisticmanagement framework ensures that ICure's Al applications are not only developed but also deployed and maintained to adhere to the highest industry standards, thereby enhancing efficiency and reliability.
ICure has initiated a comprehensive auditing process to validate its AIMS's effectiveness in alignment with ISO/IEC 42001. The stage 1audit involved an on-site evaluation by the audit team. The team evaluated the site-specific conditions, interacted with ICure's personnel, observed the deployed technologies, and reviewed the operations that support the AIMS. Following these observations, the findings weredocumented and communicated to ICure. setting the stage for subsequent actions.
Unforeseen delays and resource allocation issues introduced a significant gap between the completion of stage
1 and the onset of stage2 audits. This interval, while unplanned, provided an opportunity for reflection and preparation for upcoming challenges.
After four months, the audit team initiated the stage 2 audit. They evaluated AIMS's compliance with ISO
/IEC 42001 requirements, payingspecial attention to the complexity of processes and their documentation. It was during this phase that a critical observation was made:
ICure had not fully considered the complexity of its processes and their interactions when determining the extent of documentedinformation. Essential processes related to Al model training, validation, and deployment were not documented accurately, hinderingeffective control and management of these critical activities. This issue was recorded as a minor nonconformity, signaling a need forenhanced control and management of these vital activities.
Simultaneously, the auditor evaluated the appropriateness and effectiveness of the "AIMS Insight Strategy," a procedure developed by ICure to determine the AIMS internal and external challenges. This examination identified specific areas for improvement, particularly in the way stakeholder input was integrated into the system. It highlighted how this could significantly enhance the contribution of relevant parties in strengthening the system's resilience and effectiveness.
The audit team determined the audit findings by taking into consideration the requirements of ICure, the previous audit records and conclusions, the accuracy, sufficiency, and appropriateness of evidence, the extent to which planned audit activities are realized and planned results achieved, the sample size, and the categorization of the audit findings. The audit team decided to first record all the requirements met; then they proceeded to record the nonconformities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Question:
Based on Scenario 7, the audit team conducted a Stage 2 audit after a considerable time from Stage 1. Is this recommended?

A. Yes, a bigger gap between Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits allows the audit team time for reflection and preparation in addressing the findings
B. No, the Stage 2 audit should be conducted immediately after the Stage 1 audit to quickly address any identified issues
C. No, the gap between Stage 1 and Stage 2 audits should be minimal (usually two weeks) to ensurethat the AIMS remains consistent and relevant during the audit process

Answer: C

Explanation:
Aminimal gapbetween Stage 1 and Stage 2 is strongly recommended.
* ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.3.1.2states:"The interval between Stage 1 and Stage 2 should be short to avoid changes to system implementation or operating conditions."
* TheISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Training Guiderecommendsa maximum gap of 90 days, preferably 2-3 weeks, to ensure continuity.
Reference:ISO/IEC 17021-1:2015 Clause 9.3.1.2; ISO/IEC 42001 Lead Auditor Guide Section 6 ("Audit Timing and Continuity").

NEW QUESTION # 97
......

Though there are three versions of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam braindumps: the PDF, Software and APP online. When using the APP version for the first time, you need to ensure that the network is unblocked, and then our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor guide questions will be automatically cached. The network is no longer needed the next time you use it. You can choose any version of our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Practice Engine that best suits your situation. It's all for you to learn better.

Dumps ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Download: https://www.lead1pass.com/PECB/ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor-practice-exam-dumps.html

Our Blog

Hugo Shaw Hugo Shaw

Biografia